GIS and E911/NG911 Peer Exchange
Summary Report


← Return to Report

Figure 5 Description

Overview

The majority of Alabama counties’ GIS Data On-Boarding status is Validator Training, followed by Analysis Report Review, then Gap Analysis Part 2, then Gaps Analysis, then Data Uploaded to Datamarx.

Values

Alabama Map Data
Validator Training Gap Analysis
Part 2
Analysis Report Review Gaps Analysis Data Uploaded to Datamarx
  • Colbert
  • Limestone
  • Madison
  • Jackson
  • Morgan
  • Marshall
  • DeKalb
  • Blount
  • Etowah
  • Walker
  • St. Clair
  • Tuscaloosa
  • Talladega
  • Randolph
  • Chambers
  • Tallapoosa
  • Elmore
  • Autauga
  • Dallas
  • Macon
  • Russell
  • Bullock
  • Barbour
  • Crenshaw
  • Choctaw
  • Wilcox
  • Washington
  • Monroe
  • Escambia
  • Mobile
  • Baldwin
  • Coffee
  • Dale
  • Henry
  • Geneva
  • Houston
  • Winston
  • Cullman
  • Pickens
  • Chilton
  • Marengo
  • Lowndes
  • Montgomery
  • Pike
  • Lauderdale
  • Lamar
  • Cleburne
  • Jefferson
  • Shelby
  • Clay
  • Bibb
  • Coosa
  • Sumter
  • Greene
  • Hale
  • Perry
  • Montgomery
  • Lee
  • Clarke
  • Butler
  • Covington
  • Conecuh
  • Franklin
  • Marion
  • Fayette
  • Cherokee
  • Calhoun
  • Lawrence
Jefferson County Inset Map Data
  • Hueytown
  • Bessemer
  • Hoover
  • Homewood
  • Adamsville
  • Midfield
  • Birmingham
  • Adamsville
  • Gardendale
  • Mountainbrook
  • Vestavia Hills
  • Irondale
  • Tarrant

Presentation

The image is a color-coded county map of Alabama showing which of five different GIS Data On-Boarding status levels each county has reached. In addition, the image contains a color-coded Jefferson County Inset.

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000